and, in doing so, affected attitudes to fashion design throughout
Europe. Before she became involved in the field, fashion training had
existed almost exclusively within the strictures of the couturier
system. She brought the freedom of a painter to the discipline of
designing and making clothes, and throughout her career she pursued in
tandem her two great talents for painting and design.
In 1925, at the age of 15, Muriel entered the local school of art at
Burslem, in the Potteries, as its youngest student. While many
contemporaries, including two of her sisters, trained as designers and
decorators of ceramics, she was determined to become a proper artist
and, in 1928, succeeded in gaining a scholarship and a major award to
the School of Painting at the Royal College of Art. And yet, while the
conditions and purposes of a provincial school of art had made her
idealise the art of painting, a breakdown of the divisions between the
four schools of the Royal College encouraged her to develop the more
interdisciplinary approach which prepared her for her working life.
During the first summer vacation, a chance encounter helped Muriel
Pemberton to realise that her aptitude for fashion would help her to
maintain herself as an artist. While out walking in Stoke, a woman
inquired as to where she had bought the dress that she was wearing, a
dress that she had actually designed and made herself. On her return to
the Royal College, she discussed the idea of a diploma in fashion with
Ernest Tristram, the Professor of Design, and he allowed her to take
such a course should she be able to develop it for herself. She did so
by assembling three elements: she drew beautifully designed dresses in
rich fabrics at Reville and Rossiter, Court Dressmaker to Queen Mary;
she studied cutting at the Katinka School (paid for with lessons in
design); and she read a number of books on the history of costume as
recommended to her by James Laver.
As a result of her inspiration and initiative, Pemberton was awarded
the first Diploma in Fashion by the Royal College of Art in 1931, and
immediately began to teach fashion drawing two days a week at St
Martin’s School of Art. Almost solely through her own efforts, this
part- time position was expanded into the important role of head of the
first Faculty of Fashion and Design in Britain.
She then taught in the knowledge that the majority of her students
were developing along her own path, from painting to design, and
therefore had previously gained little practical experience of workshop
and salon. She responded to their various needs and abilities by
encouraging them to cultivate her own experimental attitude. For
instance, she encouraged them to produce free and fluent lines by
looking continually at the model rather than their paper, and sometimes
banished pencils, offering instead the thick and colourful media of oil
pastel and paint mixed with soap powder.
Many of the students who passed through St Martin’s School of Art
have paid tribute to Pemberton’s liberating influence, which contrasted
with the more conventional teaching of other members of staff. If it
did not always prepare them for the politics and economics of the rag
trade, it gave them an ideal to which to aspire, and those who were as
determined as Pemberton herself, such as Katherine Hamnett and Bruce
Oldfield, both altered the face of British fashion and helped to make
London a centre of fashion design as well as of tailoring.
teacher, were revealed to many of her students only in retrospect, at
an exhibition held this year at Chris Beetles Gallery to coincide with
the publication of her biography written by John Russell Taylor. And
yet teaching and painting were very much two aspects of a single
aesthetic. The way in which Pemberton thought about clothes is manifest
in the water-colours that she exhibited at the Royal Society of
Painters in Water-Colour and the Royal Academy. Portraits were
considered as extensions of her work as a fashion artist on News
Chronicle (1945- 52) and Vogue (1952-56), while floral still life,
inspired by the passion for gardens of her husband, John Hadley Rowe
(Head of Graphics at St Martin’s School of Art), was treated in terms
of pattern and layering, and open to reworking (as if updated for the
new season) well after the signature had been added. Even when fashion
has evolved beyond present perceptions, her vital, colourful paintings
will stand testament to her approach to life.
We are grateful to David Buckman for the above biographical note.